WEKO3
アイテム
英語の節構造とNegP分析再考
https://doi.org/10.34411/00000217
https://doi.org/10.34411/000002177239fc25-842f-497e-a5d6-22712a473d57
| 名前 / ファイル | ライセンス | アクション |
|---|---|---|
kka-022-009.pdf (15.3 MB)
|
|
| Item type | 紀要論文 / Departmental Bulletin Paper(1) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 公開日 | 2020-11-24 | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | 英語の節構造とNegP分析再考 | |||||||||
| 言語 | ja | |||||||||
| タイトル | ||||||||||
| タイトル | Yes I Splites and Neg Heads ! -The NegP Analysis Revisited | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 言語 | ||||||||||
| 言語 | jpn | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Functional categories (機能範疇） | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Negative questions (否定疑問文） | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Neg-\nIncorporation (否定辞編入） | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | NegP (否定辞句） | |||||||||
| キーワード | ||||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 主題Scheme | Other | |||||||||
| 主題 | Split-Infl Hypothesis (分離Infl仮説） | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | ||||||||||
| 資源タイプ識別子 | http://purl.org/coar/resource_type/c_6501 | |||||||||
| 資源タイプ | departmental bulletin paper | |||||||||
| ID登録 | ||||||||||
| ID登録 | 10.34411/00000217 | |||||||||
| ID登録タイプ | JaLC | |||||||||
| 著者 |
岩本, 弘道
× 岩本, 弘道
× Iwamoto, Hiromichi
|
|||||||||
| 抄録 | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Abstract | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | This paper is an attempt to examine and to refute the arguments presented by Murakami (1995) and Matsubara (1997) against postulating a Negation Phrase (NegP) headed by a functional category Neg for the analysis of English negative sentences. The postulation of the Neg projection in the clause structure has recently been proposed by a number of authors, such as Pollock (1989) and Belletti (1990) especially for some Romance languages, and Chomsky (1989/1991) for English among others. My previous paper, Iwamoto (1994), also endorsed the NegP analysis. On the other hand, both Murakami and Matsubara cast doubt on the NegP analysis and advocate the traditional IP analysis and propose what can be called 'an I-Negation analysis'; they are in accord in proposing that the negative formative not is adjoined to Infl in sentential negation. This paper shows that the main claims of Murakami and Matsubara that contrary to the predictions of the NegP analysis, Infl and Neg in English form a complex head and moreover, Neg and the following VP do not constitute a single constituent are in fact not well-founded either on the logical or empirical ground. It is also shown that the allegedly problematic data they adduce to support their I-Negation analysis can be fairly well dealt with in terms of the NegP analysis too. | |||||||||
| 言語 | en | |||||||||
| 書誌情報 |
神奈川工科大学研究報告.A,人文社会科学編 巻 22, p. 91-120, 発行日 1998-03-20 |
|||||||||
| 出版者 | ||||||||||
| 出版者 | 神奈川工科大学 | |||||||||
| ISSN | ||||||||||
| 収録物識別子タイプ | PISSN | |||||||||
| 収録物識別子 | 09161899 | |||||||||
| フォーマット | ||||||||||
| 内容記述タイプ | Other | |||||||||
| 内容記述 | application/pdf | |||||||||
| 著者版フラグ | ||||||||||
| 出版タイプ | VoR | |||||||||
| 出版タイプResource | http://purl.org/coar/version/c_970fb48d4fbd8a85 | |||||||||
